My thesis is: I feel that the government should offer insensitive, such as tax break for people that register themselves as organ donors.
One of the strongest parts about this essay for me is the emotional and relating aspect. Since I had a heart transplant, I am able to argue my point using a lot of detail about my personal experience going through that tremendous ordeal. That is a great way to capture an audience and a reader. I also made good arguments as to why the government should offer this type of insensitive. The government ultimately was created for the betterment of the people. I give examples as to how the government has been set up to help the people, such as Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security.
One of the weakest evidence is I fail to mention someone's view of not being an organ donor. Since I have such a biased opinion about this topic, I discount why someone would stay away from organ donation. I can talk about possible religious reasons for not become a donor or just the fact that someone may not feel comfortable with being put on a list. The government may not want to get involved with religion or someones personal ideals.
I think some of the evidence I had for the government offering an insensitive for organ donation is strong because it relates very well to a personal experience I had. As I said, that might grab the reader emotionally. I don't think I will discuss possible reasons for not being a organ donor because it will take away from my very strong personal opinion and from the heat of my argument.
No comments:
Post a Comment